You are hereAndre Anglin, why did you take that pill?
Andre Anglin, why did you take that pill?
Hey Andre, why did you swallow the jew lie that all Whites are a little mixed? Mixed with what? That is exactly what the jew bastards would want you to believe.In that manner, White becomes relative, and all jews would like to see each and every White with a little nigger in him.
Typically, the only Whites that swallow that lie are mixed themselves. They feel comfortable, even legitimate, in the notion that the whole world is just like them: mutts. But it just isn't true. It is jew propaganda by which they would encourage all Whites that mixing does not matter.
If you are indeed a thinker, you had better think harder. Stop falling for jew tricks.
- Add new comment
- 1816 reads
This was a comment I made privately, and I was referring to genetic tests which have been conducted showing that a percentage of Asian or Arab blood exists in all European populations. It is not something I would come out and say publicly, because I don't personally think it matters if a person is 1/128th Mongolian or not.
The method through which the genetic tests are done could certainly be questioned. However, the amount of rape that took place when the Mongolians and Arabs invaded Europe can't really be questioned.
For the record, I can trace my own lineage back to Northern Europe, and am not aware of any mixing having happened there. I am about as pasty as they come. It seems a bit unnecessary to imply that I must be part nigger for simply bringing up genetic science, which even if it is a Jewish hoax - and I wouldn't be surprised - is nonetheless wholly accepted by academia, and thus surely a discussion can be had about it without needing to make any accusations.
The problem for me is that we would have to decide that Greeks/Italians/Hungarians/etc. are non-White, and I don't really think that is fair.
I know that you have a religious conviction here, and that is fine; I do try my best to respect peoples' religious convictions, and not offend them unnecessarily. This is certainly not an issue that I plan on trying to discuss publicly any further than here where you have already made it public.
88
AA
I shall apologize, since I was informed of remarks made in a conversation, but I was not aware that the conversation was private. I was led to believe that it was not. However now that this is posted, it should stay, in my opinion, unless you request otherwise.
Religious conviction in this instance is immaterial. I like to think that I can make very objective assessments of history, an area where I am at least moderately well-read. Genetic scientists often fail by not understanding the historical movements of populations and in often assuming that current populations are aboriginal.
Genetic scientists also fail because they make assumptions about which genes are alien and which are not, without having a complete record which can be said to represent an original base. Their conclusions are often only based on the presence of genes, and their own postulations as to how those genes came into existence in any particular population.
It can be demonstrated through historical documents, that the genetic scientists' version of the genetic history of the Middle East, for example, is precisely contrary to the historical records.
The jewish media also loves to trick us with words. The statement that "a percentage of Asian or Arab blood exists in all European populations" is certainly true today, but it is not true that all individuals in Europe have "Asian or Arab blood".
There is no doubt that a large percentage of southern and eastern Europeans suffer various degrees of alien admixture. However Central and Western Europe have suffered admixture to a much lesser degree, and for the most part only much more recently than the other areas.
Europe as a culture (not as a geographical entity) was much larger two and three thousand years ago, and included Anatolia, Mesopotamia, the Levant, North Africa, and points beyond even those. So our race has suffered mongrelization far worse what most WNs have perceived. However Europeans were just as diverse in their physical features two and three thousand years ago as they are today, if we consider only those Europeans generally perceived to be void of arab, turk, negro or mongol admixture..
We cannot ever defend Whites if we perceive them all to be gray. We would stand defeated by the jew since we would have no moral ground to make any distinction. If White is relative, we lose to the jew. We must uphold the Aryan ideal as the pure representative of our race, and defend that ideal even if it is true that not all of us - those of us who are still perceived as White - measure up to that ideal. Otherwise, without such a clear model, we have nothing of substance to defend.